Córdoba sets standards for the use of e-voting in Argentina


voto-electronico1

E-voting yielded positive results in Marcos Juárez and La Falda, municipalities of the Córdoba province in Argentina (Photo: http://www.diaadia.com.ar)

Recent elections in different Argentine provinces made it possible to consolidate the nation’s democratic system, and also defined benchmarks for the use of e-voting in the country.e

Two types of electoral technology were tested out during the July 5 elections in Buenos Aires and Córdoba. The performance of one type was vastly different from the other.

While Córdoba (specifically in the La Falda and Marcos Juárez municipalities) used technology provided by Smartmatic—which automates the most important stages of voting: capture, tally, aggregation, and transmission—, the capital of Argentina used the Single E-Ballot (BUE) provided by MSA (Magic Software Argentina), which only automates the tallying.

Results gathered by the electoral authorities and the media show that while in Córdoba the voting process progressed neatly and quickly and results were presented 45 minutes after the polling places were closed, Buenos Aires presented irregularities before and during the elections. In fact, 532 polling places were left untallied due to transmission flaws.

These results were discussed by the authorities and civil associations. For example, Luis Rubio, spokesman from the Supreme Court, stated that “by the early morning around 12 percent of the votes were left untallied and nobody said anything.” Governor José Manuel de la Sota also acknowledged that the single ballot’s counting system “made tallying slower.”

On the other hand, the secretary of the Electoral Court of Córdoba, María José Páez Molina, pointed out that the “(e-voting) process was carried out normally, meeting expectations, and posing no problem for voters.” The entity’s spokesman, Jorge Namur, added that the fact that the day was successful makes it possible to anticipate the extension of e-voting to the entire province.

A positive aspect in both electoral processes is the citizens’ willingness to use technology to vote. Córdoba Transparente, an organization that monitored the electoral process in La Falda, stated that the survey carried out on election day showed that 92% of the population considered that machine-assisted e-voting was easy to use, and 89% said the system was fast. In Buenos Aires, more than 70% of the people said that the electronic system is faster than the manual model.

After the event, Córdoba made it clear that it made the right choice in e-voting for its citizens. On the other hand, Buenos Aires still has pending work to do: it needs to seek a technology model that guarantees the process, and that automates not only the tallying, but the whole electoral process. Buenos Aires might as well follow the example set by La Falda and Marcos Juárez.

E-voting rising on the Argentinean horizon


mediumIn light of the lack of an e-voting project at the federal level, several Argentinian provinces have chosen to go one step ahead and experiment with electoral technology in recent years. Only this year, the governments of Buenos Aires, Posadas, Misiones, and Mendoza approved the use of some form of e-voting system for the 2015 elections.

In their transition toward e-voting, the regions of Salta, Córdoba, and Santa Fe have implemented the model known as the electronic ballot box with smart ballots, which is not a comprehensive e-voting solution but a device designed to automate tallying.

This experience—which has yielded positive results sometimes, and sometimes has presented problems—should be taken as a trampoline into the advancement of e-voting implementation, rather than being seen as the “fast way” to perform automation.

Argentina has the possibility of enjoying all the benefits that electronic suffrage has to offer. These range from the effective validation of voters’ identities and a simple voting process, to the digital and printed recording of each vote, as well as the tallying, aggregation, and transmission of results, and the system audits throughout all stages.

To go from using only automated tallying, still favoring manual suffrage, to delivering a 100% automated voting system is the decision that the authorities must make in 2015. These regions are facing the option to bet on improving their current voting system, one where human error—intentional or unintentional—is minimized while speeding up and streamlining processes that are simply impossible in traditional elections.

Electoral guarantees are at the decision-makers’ reach. Only political responsibility and respect toward the people’s intent will make it possible for e-voting to dominate Argentina’s suffrage.